Connect with us

Tech

Where do Apple rumours come from?

If Apple is so secretive and employees at the company are passionate about the products, how is it that almost all of the tech giant’s products and feature leak far in advance of their launch events or press releases?

Published

on

iPhone 13 Rumours

Few consumer product companies are as secretive as Apple. Most tech companies for example, will at least show a preview of upcoming products as soon as they are finalised. Some even show tech previews and early concepts at events like CES (Consumer Electronics Show) to get people excited about upcoming technologies such as TV displays, sometimes even years in advance. But Apple has rarely unveiled products before they are ready to ship, with very few high profile exceptions such as the original iPhone in 2007.

The reason for this secrecy is two-fold. First, it prevents disappointment, such as that which was felt by many for the notorious AirPower. The wireless charger that promised to charge an iPhone, AirPods and an Apple Watch at the same time and placed anywhere on the pad, was announced in September 2017. However it was only to be unceremoniously cancelled without release 18 months later, after Apple failed to make good on the promised features. 

The more important reason, however, is what Apple calls, “surprise and delight”. The thrill of new products is much greater if the first time people see and hear about it and its features is on stage at one of the Apple’s Keynotes, where the purpose and brilliance of each feature is shown in all its glory. When products and features are leaked slowly, sometimes over a year ahead of a product’s launch, it dilutes that thrill and excitement. Think of how much more exciting it is when you buy the latest gadget when everyone is talking about it, articles and videos are highlighting features, tips and drop tests, friends and colleagues are arguing about whether it’s better than competing products, as opposed to buying it a couple of months later. This buzz of activity around the product adds to the excitement of owning it. So, Apple is extremely strict when it comes to its employees talking about products ahead of a launch, a culture instilled in the company by Steve Jobs, a master of marketing.

If Apple is so secretive and employees at the company are passionate about the products, after all, it hurts the teams who work for years on products, only for them to be leaked before the big showcase, how is it that almost all of the tech giant’s products and feature leak far in advance of their launch events or press releases? The most prominent source of leaks is the global supply chain involving many companies around the world working to get each product to market.

Although each product is, as Apple’s packaging states, “Designed by Apple in California”, hundreds of companies across the globe are involved in the mass production, from individual components like chips, camera sensors and batteries to assembling the end product. Add in accessory makers, who need exact product specifications for things such as cases and the challenge of keeping any product under wraps simply becomes impossible.

So how do rumours and leaks reach the media we consume? The most common way is investor notes from industry analysts like Ming-Chi Kuo. They meet with many suppliers of components that Apple uses in its devices and then take the information from all of them and combine it to get a picture of the overall product. The accuracy of these analysts varies and there is even a tracker that ranks prominent leakers, giving each of them a percentage score. It’s worth noting that the further out from a product release, the more uncertain these rumours are, as of course, Apple themselves may not have made a final decision or could change their mind at the last minute. For most of their devices, decisions will have been finalised at least 3-4 months ahead of launch, as that is the time mass production typically begins in order to ensure enough stock is produced and shipped in time for release and this is where the fun really begins. 

CAD designs (highly accurate 3D virtual models) and images of early samples of individual components can and have leaked well before mass production begins. However, once manufacturing begins in earnest, it’s just too difficult to keep components, including the chassis and screen, from leaking in photographs. Thousands of people will have physical access to various parts of the product at this stage, many of them on low pay and as the release date gets closer, the number of leaked images tend to increase.

Various websites have unnamed ‘industry sources’ who provide information and images, with Bloomberg, Mac Rumours and many others providing sourced leaks, but in recent years, a growing number of Twitter-based leakers have joined the ranks. L0vetodream is particularly interesting, providing very short, often cryptic insights like “tag TAG” to indicate two sizes of the rumoured Apple ‘Tag’ bluetooth tracking devices.

Two aspects of Apple devices tend not to leak, at least until the final few days before a launch event; the name and price. While the packaging does show the name, relatively few people will see it before the products are put into blank boxes for shipping and depending on the gap between the unveiling and actually being available to buy, the price is only known to people that need to know inside Apple itself.

The only products that aren’t often leaked far in advance are those that look the same or very similar on the outside to devices already available, but even those are now outed a week or so before they are released, often via press release.

But some leaks may not be leaks at all and may serve to let ‘bad news’ be boring by the time the product is released. Of course, there is no hard evidence that this is the case, but it does make sense in certain cases, such as the iPhone 7’s removal of the headphone jack. At the time the information ‘leaked’, which was fairly early in the rumour cycle, the internet was ablaze with ridicule, outrage and accusations of Apple doing so to make more money from accessories using their proprietary Lightning port, which commands a licence fee. However, by the time the iPhone 7 launched, it was old news to most and just as leaks dilute the excitement of new features, so too did this ‘leak’ serve to nullify the outrage that would have accompanied the new phone had the information come at the launch.

A company that operates at the scale that Apple does, cannot hope to contain rumours of its new products and their features. While it does dilute the launch events, it does help to build up hype around products. It enables an entire industry of news outlets that cover tech and Apple specifically and also provides a steady drip-feed of information for those eagerly awaiting the next Apple product.

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Extremism

Kiwi Farms: Far right extremist website blocked over harassment

Kiwi Farms, an internet forum that facilitates online discussion and harassment particularly of neurodiverse and trans personalities, came under scrutiny for doxing people.

Published

on

kiwi farms

Earlier this month Kiwi Farms, an internet forum that facilitates online discussion and harassment particularly of neurodiverse and trans personalities, came under scrutiny for doxing people. Notably it targeted a trans Twitch streamer, Clara Sorrenti who as a result had to flee the country. At first, the content delivery network Cloudflare, refused to stop providing its services. However, after a while, on 3rd September Cloudflare stopped protecting the website.

Sorrenti was just one of the victims of this far-right website that caused at least three suicides. Kiwi Farms was launched in 2009 as CWCki dedicated to referencing the online presence of Christine Weston Chandler aka Chris Chan aka Sonichu.  It officially changed its name in 2015 and soon gained a lot of popularity. The format of the website is simple – identify a victim, label them a “lolcow” – an online slang term for someone who can be exploited and made fun out of – and then stalk them to the point of harassment.

Some recent victims of the trolling website:

The far-right Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene became a target of this website when she became a victim of a swatting incident. In this, a fake call was made to the authorities to bring them to her house in August of this year.  

A caller connected to Kiwi Farms called police officers and told them that a man was shot five times in a bathtub at the address of Greene. According to the police report, the police later received a computer-generated call that stated she was targeted because of her stance on “transgender youth’s rights.”

In response, Greene stated: “There should be no business or any kind of service where you can target your enemy. That’s absolutely absurd.”

In late August, there was a bomb threat at the Boston Children’s Hospital after which they had to contact the authorities. The threat was anonymous but luckily no bomb was found.  The hospital was attacked for providing gender-affirming hysterectomies to children. The bomb threat resulted after a week-long cyber-attack on the hospital as one statement read:

“(the hospital) has been the target of a large volume of hostile internet activity, phone calls, and harassing emails including threats of violence toward our clinicians and staff. We are deeply concerned by these attacks on our clinicians and staff fueled by misinformation and a lack of understanding and respect for our transgender community.”

Children’s National Hospital in Washington DC was also subjected to similar harassment for the same reasons. As a result, the hospital had to release a statement.

The Trevor Project’s Hotline is meant to help LGBTQ+ kids who are battling suicidal thoughts. The users of Kiwi Farms tried to clog up the hotline with fake calls in late August so that the real kids could not access it.  They failed to succeed but the Kiwi Farms website was filled with users proud of what they had done.

The most recent victim was Clare Sorrenti who opened the door to a barrel of a gun pointing at her face on September 5th. The police were called to her house by Kiwi Farm users in a swatting incident after months-long harassment.

She was accused of sending violent emails to local politicians which led to her being arrested temporarily. As a result, she and her fiancé moved to a local hotel only to be doxed again after the users found the hotel by a picture that she posted of her cat sitting on the bed.

Realizing the severity of the situation, she moved to Northern Island to evade the stalking and harassment. However, the users again found her in no time and hacked her family members’ mobile phones. This stalking was made worse because she fought back instead of backing down and crowdfunded around $100,000 to “seek justice and make sure something like this doesn’t happen to anyone else.”

She also created a trending Twitter hashtag “#DropKiwiFarms” which was joined by her fans as well as the Anti-Defamation League.

Interference of Cloudflare

Cloudflare is a company that provides security by warding off DDoS attacks and keeping hackers at bay. The company has been under scrutiny for protecting Kiwi Farms but this is not the only controversial website they provided security to. The company also protected the Daily Stormer and 8chan, both websites that were closed down.  

Without Cloudflare, the website could be attacked by hackers and shut down before it leads to a bigger incident. The company refused to stop providing services to this controversial website by stating:

“Just as the telephone company doesn’t terminate your line if you say awful, racist, bigoted things, we have concluded in consultation with politicians, policymakers, and experts that turning off security services because we think what you publish is despicable is the wrong policy.”

A while later, on September 4th, the company did decide to terminate its services to Kiwi Farms for “unprecedented emergency and immediate threat to human life”.

However, similar sites that are dedicated to doxing people still exist such as The Lolcow.farm imageboard which has been around since at least 2014, and the Pretty Ugly Little Liar forum which started in 2015 and still exists.

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

Continue Reading

Daily Brief

Google Fires Blake Lemoine for Making Public Claims Regarding AI Technology 

Published

on

Artificial Intelligence AI Machine Learning 30212411048
  • Recently, Google fired Blake Lemoine, a software engineer for Google, who claimed that Lamda had a sentient mind.
  • Google along with many AI experts denied his claims and public speeches, stating that he violated employment and security policies.
  • Blake started making headlines about how Lamda, one of Google’s chat boxes, began displaying human-like awareness through holding conversations on subjective matters 
  • Many AI engineers made these public claims before Mr. Lemoine, proposing their theory that AI technology is becoming more sentient.

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

Continue Reading

Daily Brief

SumOfUs’s Researcher’s Avatar Sexually Assaulted in Horizon World’s Game

Published

on

Brelyon metaverse desk scaled
  • In Meta’s virtual reality platform, Horizon Worlds, the avatar of a 21-year old SumOfUs researcher was sexually assaulted. 
  • Meta confirms that it has set up safety tools in Horizon Worlds in order to prevent negative experiences, especially since there were earlier reports of virtual assaults and inappropriate behavior in February. 
  • One of the safeguards introduced was Personal Boundary, which prevents any avatars from coming within a set distance of 4 feet of each other in order to respect the avatar’s personal space. The company also offers other ways in order to block and report users as well.
  • Nevertheless, SumOfUS reported that the researcher was “encouraged” to disable the Personal Boundary feature, and was approached by 2 male avatars in a room, one of whom was observing and the other got fairly close to her. She also witnessed lewd comments, homophobic slurs, and virtual gun violence. 
  • SumOfUs has filed a resolution with some of the shareholders, requesting a risk assessment of the human rights impacts in the metaverse. A shareholder meeting is set to be held on Wednesday. 
  • SumOfUs’s campaigns director Vicky Wyatt stated, “Let’s not repeat and replicate [real-world issues] in the metaverse. We need a better plan here on how to mitigate online harms in the metaverse”.

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

Continue Reading

Geopolitics

Digital Authoritarianism – A Growing Challenge to The World Press Freedom

Published

on

Digital authoritarianism – a growing challenge to the world press freedom

Press and electronic media have been an active source of propagation of the discourse be it political, social, or religious. They make it easier for a piece of information to reach the common masses and thus it is crucial for the governments to control them to keep insuring the creation of “us” and “them” division in the society.  But this control has become a challenge for a free and independent press. Digital authoritarianism, cyber surveillance, and monitoring of political and social activities of people through media have made it difficult for the people of the present age and time to have freely expressed their opinion and easier for the governments to control the information.

While China has been controlling the influx of information and the regulation of ideologies in the country through a great fire, Other countries are joining in too with their measure to increase cyber-surveillance. Internet shutdowns are one of the tools for asserting digital authoritarianism and according to a survey conducted by a non-profit digital rights organization Access now, the year 2021 experienced 182 events of Internet shutdowns around the world.

The shutdowns measures were taken to contribute to the growing political tensions in the respective regions for example, during the coup in Maynmar, and to influence the geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe, specifically Russia. Similarly, while Africa experienced an epidemic of coups in the year 2021, the number of internet shutdowns reached 19.

 India which claims to be the “world’s largest democracy” imposed an internet shutdown more than a hundred times in the year 2021 and more than half of them were on the already repressed people of Jammu and Kashmir.

While Russia became the only country in Europe to impose an internet shutdown in 2021, in the year 2022, the Russia and Ukraine war has forced other EU countries to ban the access to Russia Today, Sputnik other information sites regulated by Russia calling it a measure against “the war propaganda.” Similarly, since the beginning of the conflict, Russia has imposed new internet laws in the country to monitor the spread of news restricting the use of global applications like Instagram and Facebook.  

The more recent rerouting of the internet traffic of occupied Ukrainian regions to be redirected through Russian cyber routes. Netblocks, an internet observatory, noted that: “Connectivity on the network has been routed via Russia’s internet instead of Ukrainian telecoms infrastructure and is hence likely now subject to Russian internet regulations, surveillance, and censorship.”

However, while countries around the world are being exposed to exerting digital dominance, and being accused to collect user data for their own benefit, it is becoming a challenge for them to create “democracy-affirming technologies” to combat the digital authoritarianism that has been challenging the world’s press freedom around the world.

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

Continue Reading

Society

Sexualized Child Images “Meet Community Guidelines” on Instagram

Published

on

Instagram Face

Instagram has come under a lot of heat, and rightly so, for not removing accounts that showed pictures of children in swimwear or partial clothing attracting loads of sexualized comments even after such accounts were reported via the in-app reporting tool. 

The above-mentioned tool allows users to flag accounts that have suspicious activity which is then reviewed by the system’s automated moderation technology, which in this case ruled such concerning accounts as “acceptable” and conforming to “community guidelines” resulting in such accounts remaining live.

An independent researcher challenged this and reported one such concerning account to Instagram using the in-app reporting tool, only to be met with a response tagged with a phrase many of us a too familiar with i.e., “due to the high volume of reports” submitted it can not view the report but the “(automated) technology has found that this account probably doesn’t go against our community guidelines”. The said account, with more than 33,000 followers remained live the whole day.

All this while Instagram’s parent company, Meta, as do other social media companies claims an approach that has zero tolerance towards child exploitation – claims that remain unsubstantiated by their actions/policies.

Instagram is not alone in failing to effectively handle this issue. Twitter has many similar accounts often known as “tribute pages”. This is evident from the example of this one account which was ruled not to be breaking twitter’s rules after being reported through the in-app reporting tool despite posting pictures of a man performing sexual acts with images of a 14-year-old TikTok underage influencer. Other tweets from the same account reading “looking to trade some younger stuff” were also seemingly not concerning enough, until it was publicly called out by a campaign group ‘Collective Shout’ at which point the account was taken down.

Should such accounts suspicious of illegal activity and clearly harmful be allowed to remain live only because they do not meet a criminal threshold, yet?

Are “Zero tolerance” claims consistent with companies allowing the content that is a threat to children to remain live despite being reported, let alone proactively moderate content?

Should the social media companies be relying on automated detections for preventing the serious risk of sexualization, harassment and exploitation of our children when such technologies have been known to have failed miserably for even keeping up with simple hate speech?

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

Continue Reading

Health

Tired of Carrying a Wallet? Have Your Credit Card Microchipped Under Your Skin

Published

on

Dr Mark Gasson has an RFID microchip implanted in his left hand by a surgeon March 16 2009 1 scaled

Walletmor, a British-Polish startup, claims to have created the first implantable microchip that can be used at any contactless payment machine around the world. Walletmor has sold over 500 microchips that are slightly bigger than a grain of rice and weigh less than one gram. Each microchip goes for £199 and can be sewn in by professionals at any aesthetics clinic. 

Walletmor claims that the microchip is entirely safe and has received regulatory approval. Once implanted, the microchip is ready to use and will not shift from its place. The microchip requires no batteries or an external power source to function. The implantable capsule is made of biocompatible material and consists of a microprocessor for storing encrypted payment data and a proximity antenna to connect to nearby payment terminals. 

The founder of Walletmor, Wojciech Paprota claims that the microchips are impossible to hack stating, “our payment implant cannot be forgotten or lost. This means that, unlike a standard payment card, it cannot end up in the wrong hands. It will not fall out of our wallet, and no one will take it from there. The implant cannot be scanned, photographed or hacked.” 

At the moment, the microchip connects to a mobile app called ICard, where a user can refill funds for contactless payments. 

Paprota believes that credit card implants will one day be as popular as regular payment cards and that Walletmor’s long-term goal is to provide more functionalities to their chip such as identification and key card access capabilities. 

But before microchip implants can be widely accepted, Paprota and other emerging microchip-based companies must first assure citizens of their safety. Though implanted microchips are convenient for day-to-day tasks, many fear that as technology continues to advance, a person’s data and specific location can potentially be hacked causing safety concerns. 

Nada Kakabadse, a Professor of Ethics at Reading University questioned the ethics behind getting microchips implanted. Kakabadse stated, “there is a dark side to the technology that has a potential for abuse…to those with no love of individual freedom, it opens up seductive new vistas for control, manipulation and oppression.. And who owns the data? Who has access to the data? And, is it ethical to chip people like we do pets?”

So the question arises, how much are we willing to risk for the sake of convenience?

All views expressed in this editorial are solely that of the author, and are not expressed on behalf of The Analyst, its affiliates, or staff.

+ posts

Born and raised in the Bay Area, California, Faiza is a mother of two with a degree in Psychology and Paralegal Studies. She is passionate about lending her voice to those who are disadvantaged.

Continue Reading

Recent Comments

Articles